<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blog="http://dnn-connect.org/blog/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
  <channel>
    <title>FUNDED Articles - pork barrel</title>
    <link>https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/term/177/recs/10/locale/en-US/FUNDED-Articles-pork-barrel</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 14:36:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 14:36:41 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <category>pork barrel</category>
    <generator>DotNetNuke Blog RSS Generator Version 6.5.4.0</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <atom:link href="https://www.grantsoffice.com/DesktopModules/Blog/API/RSS/Get?moduleid=1803&amp;tabid=867&amp;term=177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Much Ado About Earmarks </title>
      <link>https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4564/Much-Ado-About-Earmarks</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Earmark spending, the direct appropriation of federal funds to a specified recipient, is paradoxically one of the most beloved and abhorred traditions in American politics. After all, one legislator&amp;#39;s definition of pork barrel spending is another&amp;#39;s much-needed job-saving investment - opposing views shared just as often among constituents as well.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <author>devteam@grantsoffice.com (Grants Office, LLC)</author>
      <blog:author>Grants Office, LLC</blog:author>
      <category>appropriations</category>
      <category>Congress</category>
      <category>earmarks</category>
      <category>legislation</category>
      <category>Political Landscape</category>
      <category>pork barrel</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4564/Much-Ado-About-Earmarks</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <blog:publishedon>2010-12-15 05:00:00Z</blog:publishedon>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>