The Impending Sequestration and Tax Rate Debate: Is it really a cliff?

devteam@grantsoffice.com (Grants Office, LLC) — Mon, 19 Nov 2012 05:00:00 GMT

Much has been made about the impending doom associated with the automatic spending cuts (sequestration) and expiration of the tax rates established during the George W. Bush Presidency. All the pundits point to the likelihood of a second recession if politicians in Washington allow the country to go "off the cliff". Sequestration alone will initiate $1.2 trillion in automatic cuts across the entire budget, which means every sector from education and healthcare to defense spending will be effected. The measure was put in place because it is not palatable to any politician, Democrat or Republican, to see such blanket cuts in discretionary spending. The idea was to give Congress and the President time to come to a long-term agreement on deficit reduction.

Reducing Deficits, Sustaining Grants

devteam@grantsoffice.com (Grants Office, LLC) — Mon, 15 Nov 2010 05:00:00 GMT

It has been two years of high price-tag legislation, including the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), and the upcoming debate over the extension of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts. Given these kinds of historic legislation, Americans are experiencing something of a national sticker shock and demands for deficit reduction continue to grow. All of this is hardly auspicious news from the vantage point of grantseekers.

FUNDED Articles - fiscal reform

The Impending Sequestration and Tax Rate Debate: Is it really a cliff?

Reducing Deficits, Sustaining Grants