<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blog="http://dnn-connect.org/blog/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
  <channel>
    <title>FUNDED Articles - grant writing</title>
    <link>https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/term/92/recs/10/locale/en-US/FUNDED-Articles-grant-writing</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 14:00:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 14:00:10 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <category>grant writing</category>
    <generator>DotNetNuke Blog RSS Generator Version 6.5.4.0</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <atom:link href="https://www.grantsoffice.com/DesktopModules/Blog/API/RSS/Get?moduleid=1803&amp;tabid=867&amp;term=92" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Proposal Development Special Guide: Tips for the Budget</title>
      <link>https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4502/Proposal-Development-Special-Guide-Tips-for-the-Budget</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Show me the money! As far as a grant funder is considered, it is probably more appropriate to say &amp;ldquo;show me how you are going to spend the money&amp;rdquo;. For the applicant, it is the piece of the proposal that is likely to keep you up at night. After all, the reason you are seeking grant funding the first place is because you are most likely facing a funding deficit for an important project. It is only natural that you may be preoccupied with budgetary needs while you are still developing the project and the accompanying proposal narrative.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <author>devteam@grantsoffice.com (Grants Office, LLC)</author>
      <blog:author>Grants Office, LLC</blog:author>
      <category>budget</category>
      <category>budget development</category>
      <category>cost-share</category>
      <category>grant writing</category>
      <category>match requirements</category>
      <category>matching</category>
      <category>proposal development</category>
      <category>Proposal Development</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4502/Proposal-Development-Special-Guide-Tips-for-the-Budget</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <blog:publishedon>2012-03-16 05:00:00Z</blog:publishedon>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>From the Other Side: A Reviewer's Perspective </title>
      <link>https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4503/From-the-Other-Side-A-Reviewer-s-Perspective</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Despite the persistently slow economy and ongoing budget cuts at every level, the U.S. Federal Government awarded nearly $600 billion in grants in 2011, which represents a 20% increase over the approximately $500 billion in grants awarded in 2009. On average, only about three to five percent of grant proposals submitted to the federal government are awarded funding. With more budget cuts on the horizon, the already tough competition for federal grant dollars is poised to become even more fierce. That means that now more than ever, only the &amp;#39;best of the best&amp;#39; proposals will get funded. The loss of just a single scoring point can make the difference between success and failure. I regularly work as a peer reviewer for a number of federal funding agencies so I see firsthand what sets winning grant proposals apart from the others. I would like to share with you several common pitfalls that I frequently run across that ruin an otherwise solid proposal&amp;#39;s chances of getting funded.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <author>devteam@grantsoffice.com (Grants Office, LLC)</author>
      <blog:author>Grants Office, LLC</blog:author>
      <category>contributing writer</category>
      <category>grant writing</category>
      <category>grants</category>
      <category>letters of support</category>
      <category>proposal development</category>
      <category>Proposal Development</category>
      <category>review</category>
      <category>tips</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4503/From-the-Other-Side-A-Reviewer-s-Perspective</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <blog:publishedon>2012-02-15 05:00:00Z</blog:publishedon>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2012 Coordinated Tribal Assistance Solicitation </title>
      <link>https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4504/2012-Coordinated-Tribal-Assistance-Solicitation</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The Coordinated Tribal Assistance Solicitation (CTAS) was developed by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in 2010 to consolidate the DOJ&amp;#39;s existing Tribal-specific grant programs into one combined application package. Thus, the overall program is comprised of several individual programs or &amp;quot;Purpose Areas.&amp;quot; CTAS is intended to foster a comprehensive approach to public safety and victimization issues by encouraging tribal governments to collaborate efforts and plan a community-wide strategy for addressing a variety of law enforcement and justice issues.&lt;br /&gt;
The 2012 Coordinated Tribal Assistance Solicitation was announced on January 18, with a deadline of April 18, 2012. Over $100 million is available through this program, providing funds to support tribal public safety and justice initiatives such as community policing and tribal youth programs.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <author>devteam@grantsoffice.com (Grants Office, LLC)</author>
      <blog:author>Grants Office, LLC</blog:author>
      <category>Coordinated Tribal Assistance Solicitation</category>
      <category>CTAS</category>
      <category>grant writing</category>
      <category>grants</category>
      <category>Public Safety/Justice</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4504/2012-Coordinated-Tribal-Assistance-Solicitation</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <blog:publishedon>2012-02-15 05:00:00Z</blog:publishedon>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Proofreading Towards a Better Proposal </title>
      <link>https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4508/Proofreading-Towards-a-Better-Proposal</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:arial;"&gt;Anyone who&amp;#39;s been involved with the grants process knows its one thing to find the right grant and another thing to actually submit an application. Once you go through the trials and tribulations of putting the application together, you have may have looked over the application hundreds of times, or you may not have had much time to look it over at all. In this economic state, organizations are downsizing and people are being asked to take on more and more tasks. This can hurt the quality of an application when the submitter doesn&amp;#39;t have enough time to properly proofread the application before it is time to submit. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <author>devteam@grantsoffice.com (Grants Office, LLC)</author>
      <blog:author>Grants Office, LLC</blog:author>
      <category>editing</category>
      <category>grant writing</category>
      <category>grants</category>
      <category>proofreading</category>
      <category>Proposal Development</category>
      <category>review</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4508/Proofreading-Towards-a-Better-Proposal</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <blog:publishedon>2012-01-15 05:00:00Z</blog:publishedon>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Health Care Innovation Challenge Focus </title>
      <link>https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4511/Health-Care-Innovation-Challenge-Focus</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;As would-be applicants to the Health Care Innovation Challenge across the country are learning, the Center for Medicare &amp;amp; Medicaid Services&amp;#39; monstrous $1 billion program aimed at innovating health care and payment models in an effort to save money is no walk in the park.&lt;br /&gt;
By December 19, 2011, CMS had received well over 10,000 letters of intent for the program. While a significant percentage of these LOIs will probably not result in full proposal submissions, interest in the program has been unsurprisingly overwhelming. With the January 27 deadline looming, project developers, writers, and other grants professionals are knee-deep in the murky program requirements, which call for a tightly-knit forty-page narrative and a complex total cost of care savings plan, among other elements.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <author>devteam@grantsoffice.com (Grants Office, LLC)</author>
      <blog:author>Grants Office, LLC</blog:author>
      <category>grant writing</category>
      <category>grants</category>
      <category>HCIC</category>
      <category>Health Care Innovation Challenge</category>
      <category>healthcare</category>
      <category>Healthcare Services</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4511/Health-Care-Innovation-Challenge-Focus</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <blog:publishedon>2012-01-15 05:00:00Z</blog:publishedon>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CPR for Grantwriters: Reviving Unfunded Applications</title>
      <link>https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4528/CPR-for-Grantwriters-Reviving-Unfunded-Applications</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Grant funding, like any other competition, inevitably results in winners and losers - and unfortunately, the latter tend to outnumber the former. Take for instance, the Investing in Innovation program available from the U.S. Department of Education. This year&amp;#39;s competition brought out over 500 applicants for just under $150 million in total funding. It is likely fewer than 30 of these applications will receive funding - making it just as unlikely to receive grant funding as it is to get into Harvard.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <author>devteam@grantsoffice.com (Grants Office, LLC)</author>
      <blog:author>Grants Office, LLC</blog:author>
      <category>grant writing</category>
      <category>grants</category>
      <category>Proposal Development</category>
      <category>resubmission</category>
      <category>review</category>
      <category>rewrite</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4528/CPR-for-Grantwriters-Reviving-Unfunded-Applications</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <blog:publishedon>2011-09-15 05:00:00Z</blog:publishedon>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>It's Not Always What You Say, It's How You Say It </title>
      <link>https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4549/It-s-Not-Always-What-You-Say-It-s-How-You-Say-It</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;From one of the more memorable movie scenes of the past 20 years, you may recall a phone conversation between Tom Cruise and Cuba Gooding, Jr. that portrays the amusing contract negotiation of an agent and one of the professional sports figures he manages. A repeated and emphatic shouting of &amp;ldquo;Show me the money!&amp;rdquo; helped endear &lt;em&gt;Jerry McGuire&lt;/em&gt; to movie viewers and helped Cruise&amp;rsquo;s character succeed in achieving his intended task&amp;mdash;the movie scene ends with Cruise receiving a simply stated, &amp;ldquo;Congratulations, you&amp;rsquo;re still my agent,&amp;rdquo; from his star-in-the-making. It&amp;rsquo;s not necessarily the aggressiveness of the message itself but rather its impassioned delivery that may best carry over to grant applications.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <author>devteam@grantsoffice.com (Grants Office, LLC)</author>
      <blog:author>Grants Office, LLC</blog:author>
      <category>Grant Strategy</category>
      <category>grant writing</category>
      <category>grants</category>
      <category>Proposal Development</category>
      <category>setting</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4549/It-s-Not-Always-What-You-Say-It-s-How-You-Say-It</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <blog:publishedon>2011-03-15 05:00:00Z</blog:publishedon>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bringing Home the Bacon: Maximizing your "D"LT Score </title>
      <link>https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4551/Bringing-Home-the-Bacon-Maximizing-your-D-LT-Score</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The USDA&amp;#39;s Distance Learning and Telemedicine (or DLT) program is one of the most popular annual federal grant programs. Highly competitive, the DLT program makes awards ranging from $50,000 to $500,000 for organizations that provide education or healthcare telecommunications services to rural populations. DLT also has one of the more complex application packages, and requires applicants to provide population tables, maps, and poverty rates for each proposed service area (end-users), as well as hub sites from which services will be delivered.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <author>devteam@grantsoffice.com (Grants Office, LLC)</author>
      <blog:author>Grants Office, LLC</blog:author>
      <category>DLT</category>
      <category>Education</category>
      <category>grant writing</category>
      <category>Healthcare Services</category>
      <category>review</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4551/Bringing-Home-the-Bacon-Maximizing-your-D-LT-Score</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <blog:publishedon>2011-03-15 05:00:00Z</blog:publishedon>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Solidifying Applications </title>
      <link>https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4559/Solidifying-Applications</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:100%;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: arial;"&gt;As the new calendar and fiscal year 2011 begins, many grant programs are being reminded that they are only as valuable as the actual projects they support. Those consistently lacking results often find their government appropriations dwindle, if not dry up entirely. With everyone positioning their stake for a finite, albeit ever-growing level of federal funding, many grantmaking agencies demonstrate their value by leveraging investments in various projects that represent not only immediate community benefits but also the greatest potential for a long-term return on investment. Grantseekers therefore have an opportunity in the new year to strike while the iron is hot. Savvy applicants will likely consider one of the following project components in their FY2011 applications.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <author>devteam@grantsoffice.com (Grants Office, LLC)</author>
      <blog:author>Grants Office, LLC</blog:author>
      <category>AFG</category>
      <category>Assistance to Firefighters</category>
      <category>grant writing</category>
      <category>grants</category>
      <category>project development</category>
      <category>Proposal Development</category>
      <category>Public Safety/Justice</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4559/Solidifying-Applications</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <blog:publishedon>2011-01-15 05:00:00Z</blog:publishedon>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Reading Between the Lines: What Exactly Can the Grant Funds be Used for? </title>
      <link>https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4560/Reading-Between-the-Lines-What-Exactly-Can-the-Grant-Funds-be-Used-for</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-family: arial;"&gt;A big federal agency just released a new grant that is accompanied by a guidance document filled with 150 pages of content. The guidance document contains all the granular details on the grant program, including instructions for development of the proposal and submission. The guidance document may be referred to by several names, including request for proposals (RFP), request for applications (RFA), and Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA). Based on a quick review of the information, you are considering developing a proposal under this recently released grant program. Considering the size of the guidance document, one would assume that the items and services eligible for purchase with the grant funding are clearly delineated. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
      <author>devteam@grantsoffice.com (Grants Office, LLC)</author>
      <blog:author>Grants Office, LLC</blog:author>
      <category>allowable expenses</category>
      <category>budget</category>
      <category>eligible costs</category>
      <category>funding restrictions</category>
      <category>grant writing</category>
      <category>grants</category>
      <category>Grantseeking/Grant Research</category>
      <category>project development</category>
      <category>Proposal Development</category>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.grantsoffice.com/Old-Pages/eFUNDED/Post/4560/Reading-Between-the-Lines-What-Exactly-Can-the-Grant-Funds-be-Used-for</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <blog:publishedon>2011-01-15 05:00:00Z</blog:publishedon>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>