2026 US BUDGET SUMMARY: Research & Innovation
2026 US BUDGET SUMMARY: Research & Innovation

U.S. Federal Budget Summary: Research and Innovation  

 

Federal funding for research and innovation overlays nearly every sector of the American economy. From municipal energy grids to university laboratories to manufacturing floors, federal grants serve as vital seed capital that drives technological advancement and the nation’s global competitiveness. While the National Science Foundation (NSF), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and Department of Defense (DOD) are consistently among the largest funders of academic research, other federal agencies like the Departments of Energy (DOE) and Commerce (DOC) play equally critical roles in transitioning experimental science into applied commercial capabilities.

 

This year, funding for research initiatives was approved across both the second and third spending minibuses. This means grant funding is flowing from most major players. However, at the time of publication, the Department of Homeland Security has not secured a final budget for its Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) or the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) – creating delays for new grant activities in advanced border control, new first responder technologies, and cybersecurity innovation.

 

Major Funders

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Department of Energy (DOE)

Department of Commerce (DOC)

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)

 

Office of Science (SC)

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE)

Advanced Research Projects Agency–Energy (ARPA-E)

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

Economic Development Administration (EDA)

 

See the basics of the NSF’s grant platform – Research.gov – in our recent hands-on webinar.

Event link - https://www2.grantsoffice.com/ResearchGov

Event title - Getting Started with Research.gov: Preparing and Managing NSF Proposals

 

Securing federal research dollars in 2026 will be a highly competitive endeavor. As the current administration aligns research funding with its identified priorities, namely supply chain resilience and national security, traditional scientific exploration will continue to feel the squeeze. This contraction is already having a tangible impact on the academic community, with the National Science Foundation funding 2,200 fewer awards this past year than in previous cycles (see page 34).

  • Shifting Administrative Priorities: The federal government is aggressively steering research dollars to match new geopolitical and domestic agendas, favoring projects that yield immediate supply chain, cybersecurity, and defense benefits. Agencies like the Department of Energy (DOE) dropped funding for wind and solar power research, pivoting instead to advanced manufacturing and a 10% funding boost ($190 million) to secure energy sector infrastructure and cybersecurity. US military research reflects a similar pivot; while the Department of Defense (DOD) saw massive cuts to traditional University Research Initiatives, its highly specialized grants saw growth - including a 10.8% increase for Space Force Defense Research Sciences and a $6.3 million boost for Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Basic Research.
  • Squeezing Basic Research & Facility Funding: Across multiple agencies, broad exploratory research and facility construction pools are tightening. The National Science Foundation (NSF) absorbed a 3% overall budget reduction, including a steep 20% cut to its STEM Education allocation, bringing it down to $938 million. Similarly, the Department of Commerce (DOC) cut $40 million from its National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) research facility construction budget.
  • Scrutinizing Indirect Research Costs: The broader scientific community recently secured a massive legal victory regarding Facilities and Administrative (F&A) costs. After a coordinated administrative effort to cap indirect research cost reimbursements at 15% across the NIH, DOE, NSF, and DOD, higher education institutions successfully challenged the policy in federal court. Consequently, Congress explicitly directs federal agencies to continue honoring established Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreements (NICRAs). However, while the immediate legal threat has passed, federal scrutiny on university overhead remains. Grantseekers should expect continued pressure to justify F&A costs and prepare for policymakers to explore new, standardized models for research funding in future budget cycles.

 

Grants to Watch out For 

Program

Snippet

Regional Innovation Engines (NSF Engines) Program

Funding for technology-driven research and innovation projects that serve the region’s and nation's economic needs and strengthen national competitiveness and security

Army Defense University Research Initiative (DURIP)

Funding for basic research in science and engineering at U.S.  institutions of higher education that is of potential interest to the Department of Defense

Regional Technology Innovation Hubs

Funding develops clusters of businesses, communities, colleges and universities, and workers focused on accelerating innovation and technology deployment throughout the country

Major Research Instrumentation Program (MRI)

Funding assists the development or acquisition of multi-user research instruments that enable the advancement of science and engineering at universities and research organizations